Roxanne Cooper

Online harassment reaches new heights as 'emboldened manosphere' emerges: report

In the days following Donald Trump's presidential victory, an alarming surge in misogynistic rhetoric and threats against women has emerged online and in real life, according to a report from the Associated Press. Dubbed the 'emboldened manosphere', the trend has left many women feeling unsafe and compelled to take protective measures.

Sadie Perez, a 19-year-old political science student in Wisconsin profiled in AP's report, now carries pepper spray with her on campus. Her mother ordered self-defense kits for her and her sister.

This reaction stems from the rise of right-wing 'manosphere' influencers who have seized on Trump's win to amplify misogynistic content online.

A troubling trend is the appropriation of the pro-choice slogan "My body, my choice" into "Your body, my choice," a phrase that has spread rapidly online. Attributed to a post by far-right figure Nick Fuentes, it garnered 35 million views on its first day on X. The slogan has since appeared in middle schools, college campuses, and even on t-shirts — which were later removed by Amazon.

Online declarations calling to "Repeal the 19th" Amendment (which gave women the right to vote) have gained millions of views.

While Trump himself isn't directly amplifying this rhetoric, his campaign's focus on masculinity and repeated attacks on Kamala Harris's gender and race have contributed to the current climate. Dana Brown from the Pennsylvania Center for Women and Politics suggests that for some men, Trump's victory represents a chance to reclaim traditional gender roles they feel they're losing.

Despite the fear and disgust many women feel, some are fighting back. Perez and her peers are supporting each other, celebrating wins like female majorities in student government, and encouraging women to speak out against the misogynistic rhetoric. As Perez puts it, "I want to encourage my friends and the women in my life to use their voices to call out this rhetoric and to not let fear take over."

Maine Republican turns himself into the police

State Rep. Lucas Lanigan (R-Sanford) turned himself into the York County Jail Monday morning after a warrant was out for his arrest.

The warrant for Lanigan was for one count of domestic violence aggravated assault, which was based on reports given to the Sanford Police Department on Friday. According to information shared by Mark Dyer, major of support services and logistics for the department, Lanigan turned himself in around 9:30 a.m.

Dyer said the investigation is still ongoing.

Sgt. Colton Sweeney of the York County Sheriff’s Office said Lanigan will not be allowed to post bail until he goes before a judge, which is scheduled for Wednesday afternoon.

The Portland Press Herald reported that police searched for Lanigan over the weekend before he turned himself in.

Lanigan, who lives in Springvale and is wrapping up his first term as a state legislator, is up for reelection for his seat in the Maine House of Representatives. He is facing Democrat Patricia Kidder.

YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE.

SUPPORT

Maine Morning Star is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Maine Morning Star maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Lauren McCauley for questions: info@mainemorningstar.com. Follow Maine Morning Star on Facebook and X.

New: Trump-endorsed Bible nets former president $300,000 in royalties

Donald J. Trump's latest financial disclosure reveals a complex financial picture, balancing significant liabilities with various income sources. The former president faces over $100 million in liabilities from three civil lawsuits he lost in New York, including a $50 million bond for a civil fraud case and a judgment of $83.3 million in the E. Jean Carroll sexual abuse case.

Trump's current financial state was summarized in a new report in the New York Times.

Despite these legal challenges, Trump reports substantial income from various sources. His post-presidential books have been lucrative, with "Letters to Trump" bringing in $4.5 million, "A MAGA Journey" earning $505,763, and a Trump-endorsed Bible generating $300,000 in royalties. He also profits from licensing fees at Trump-branded properties in Dubai and Oman.

Trump's involvement in cryptocurrency and NFTs is notable. He holds over $1 million in cryptocurrency and received $7.15 million from an NFT licensing agreement. His wife, Melania, earned $330,609 from NFT sales and $237,500 for speaking at a Log Cabin Republicans event.

The disclosure also details Trump's holdings in Trump Media and Technology Group, the parent company of Truth Social. He owns nearly 65% of the company, with 114 million shares of common stock subject to a lockup period.

Trump's resorts continue to be significant revenue sources. Mar-a-Lago reported $56.9 million in resort-related revenue, up from $52.3 million the previous year. Trump National Doral in Miami generated $160.1 million in revenue.

Other income sources include a Screen Actors Guild pension worth $90,776 and ongoing royalties from "The Art of the Deal." Trump also received $16.7 million in distributions from his investments in two office buildings managed by Vornado Realty Trust.

While the disclosure provides a broad overview of Trump's finances, it doesn't offer a complete picture of his net worth or the profitability of his businesses. The form often uses broad ranges for asset values and doesn't clearly define terms like "income" for some businesses.

NOW READ: Revealed: Trump deep in debt while foreign money keeps coming

Read the full report in the New York Times.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and a dead bear

In a surprising revelation, independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. disclosed that he dumped a dead bear in New York City's Central Park nearly a decade ago. The admission, highlighted by Politico, came in a video released on social media Sunday afternoon, where Kennedy recounted the incident to actress Roseanne Barr.

Kennedy's decision to share this story appears to be preemptive, as he suggested in the video that he was addressing the incident ahead of a pending story in the New Yorker, which had inquired about it.

According to Kennedy, he did not kill the bear but found it already deceased, hit by another driver, during a falconing expedition in the Hudson Valley.

He initially planned to take the bear home to skin it but ended up driving directly to a dinner at Peter Luger Steak House in New York City. Faced with the dilemma of what to do with the bear carcass before heading to the airport, Kennedy decided to leave it in Central Park alongside an abandoned bicycle.

The story aligns with an incident reported by The New York Times in October 2014, where a dead bear was discovered in Central Park near an abandoned bicycle. At the time, the circumstances surrounding the bear's death and its appearance in the park were not publicly known.

Kennedy claimed he planted the bear with the bicycle to fit a narrative about a series of bike accidents in the city. He admitted to feeling nervous when the story was featured on "every television station," fearing he might be linked to the incident. "Luckily the story died after a while, and it stayed dead for a decade, and the New Yorker somehow found out about it," Kennedy stated in the video.

This unusual revelation comes at a time when Kennedy's presidential campaign has been facing challenges, with his poll numbers declining since President Joe Biden's exit from the race last month. It adds to a series of strange stories surrounding Kennedy, including a previous claim made during divorce proceedings that a worm had eaten part of his brain.

ALSO READ: Trump just entered his 'Fat Elvis' phase

Chaos in Trump camp: New book exposes former president's panic

A new book by political correspondent Meredith McGraw, titled "Trump in Exile," reveals the chaotic state of former President Donald Trump's political operation in the aftermath of his 2020 election loss and the January 6th Capitol riot.

The book, excerpted in Vanity Fair this week, details a frantic call Trump made to conservative consultant Susie Wiles in March 2022, pleading for her help to fix his disorganized campaign.

The excerpt provides insight into the internal struggles of Trump's post-presidency political machine and his efforts to maintain control over the Republican Party and highlights the challenges faced by Trump's team in organizing a cohesive political strategy while dealing with the fallout from the 2020 election and the events of January 6th.

According to McGraw, Trump's call to Wiles came as he and his son, Donald Trump Jr., were mounting a revenge campaign against Republicans who had spoken out against the Capitol riots. Trump reportedly told Wiles, "I don't know who's in charge. I don't know how much money I have. I don't know if they're stealing from me. I don't know who's who. I need you to fix it."

The book paints a picture of a Trump organization in disarray, with key figures like Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner distancing themselves from Trump's political activities.

McGraw describes Mar-a-Lago, Trump's Florida club, as experiencing a "strange and empty time," having lost much of its social status following the events of January 6th and amid the ongoing pandemic.

ALSO READ: Trump just entered his 'Fat Elvis' phase

A February meeting of political advisers at Mar-a-Lago is described as particularly stark, with no set agenda and no one clearly in charge. However, the meeting did indicate that Donald Trump Jr. would play a larger role in the MAGA movement going forward.

The book also highlights Trump's intense focus on targeting Republicans who had opposed him, particularly former Rep. Liz Cheney (R-WY).

McGraw writes that Trump's team believed his political fate rested on defeating Cheney, which they ultimately achieved when she lost the Republican primary to Trump-endorsed challenger Harriet Hageman in August 2022.

You can read the entire excerpt here.

Exposed: Trump's lucrative presidency

A recent Forbes financial analysis has revealed that former President Donald Trump earned more money during his time in the White House than any other U.S. president in history.

According to the report, Trump's earnings between 2016 and 2020 amounted to more than $250 million, a result of his decision to maintain control of his business empire while serving as commander-in-chief.

The analysis, based on Trump's tax returns, bond filings and credit reports, shows how Trump's business fortunes fluctuated during his presidency. In 2017, despite a $25 million settlement related to Trump University fraud allegations, Trump was able to use this loss to his advantage on his tax filings. The following year saw significant profits from properties not bearing the Trump name, including two buildings in New York City and San Francisco that brought in $55 million.

However, Trump's businesses faced challenges, with income dropping at Trump Tower and 40 Wall Street in New York City, and losses mounting at his Washington D.C. hotel.

The COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 further impacted Trump's profits, with his hotels losing about $23 million and his management business shrinking from $29 million in 2017 to just $4.5 million.

ALSO READ: Trump 'caught himself' admitting his campaign is stumped by Harris during rally: CNN

Despite these setbacks, Trump's office buildings proved to be a "short-term savior," according to Alexander, thanks to long-term leases with marquee tenants. The analysis underscores how Trump's unprecedented decision to retain his business interests while in office allowed him to continue generating substantial personal wealth throughout his presidency.

Read the entire report here.

What JD Vance really thinks of women and children — in his own words

In a comprehensive analysis of Republican vice presidential nominee J.D. Vance's views on women and children, several controversial statements and policy positions have come to light. Vance, who was recently named as former President Donald Trump's running mate, has faced renewed scrutiny over his past comments and beliefs. A recent analysis by journalist Judd Legum details Vance's views.

Vance has repeatedly criticized childless politicians, most notably referring to Vice President Kamala Harris as a "childless cat lady" who "doesn't really have a stake" in the country's future. He has extended this criticism to other Democratic leaders, suggesting that those without children should be excluded from leadership positions. However, it's worth noting that Harris is a stepmother to two children, a fact that contradicts Vance's characterization.

The Ohio senator's views on family structure are equally contentious. In a 2021 speech, Vance argued against women leaving violent marriages, suggesting that the sexual revolution's emphasis on personal happiness had negative consequences for children. When questioned about this stance, Vance deflected, citing higher rates of domestic violence among non-married couples.

Vance has also proposed controversial voting policies, suggesting that parents should have more electoral power than non-parents. He has advocated for giving votes to children, with parents controlling those votes, effectively giving families with children more influence in elections.

Despite his professed support for families, Vance has criticized efforts to make childcare more affordable. He labeled universal daycare as a "class war against normal people," implying that parents who use daycare value their jobs more than their children. This stance is at odds with the reality many American families face, with childcare costs often exceeding typical mortgage payments.

On reproductive rights, Vance has taken a hardline stance. He opposed a Department of Health and Human Services rule protecting the privacy of women seeking reproductive healthcare, arguing that abortion records should be available to law enforcement. Vance has also called for federal action to prevent women from traveling out of state for abortions, citing concerns about disproportionate impacts on Black women.

As Vance's views come under increased scrutiny, they raise questions about the potential impact on policy should the Trump-Vance ticket prevail in the upcoming election.

NOW READ: Residents symbolically cleanse Michigan town after white supremacist march

The problem with 'doing your own research': Arizona conspiracy theory edition

In a surprising turn of events, two Arizona Republican state lawmakers have found themselves at the center of a political storm after sharing a debunked conspiracy theory about President Joe Biden. The theory, which has been thoroughly discredited, suggests that the President is using body doubles to make public appearances, according to the Arizona Mirror.

State Senator Wendy Rogers, representing Flagstaff, sparked controversy when she shared a now-deleted post on X (formerly Twitter) that falsely claimed First Lady Jill Biden was simultaneously in Paris and Washington, D.C. This claim was quickly debunked by PolitiFact, which reported that the First Lady had left for France shortly after the President's address to the nation, and the photos in question were taken hours apart.

Not to be outdone, Representative Joseph Chaplik of Scottsdale also joined the fray by sharing a similar post. This one, originally from former CBS journalist Sharyl Attkisson, speculated about the potential use of a "flawless" body double for the President. Attkisson, known for promoting debunked theories in the past, was herself reposting content from a user who had been accused of fabricating their identity online.

The conspiracy theory didn't stop there. Senator Rogers went on to share additional posts claiming that President Biden had mysteriously grown taller, and even more outlandishly, that he had died and it was being covered up. When approached for comment on their posts and the credibility of their sources, both lawmakers remained silent.

This incident is not an isolated one in the world of political conspiracy theories. Similar unfounded claims have been made about other politicians, including Pennsylvania Senator John Fetterman. These theories often find fertile ground in online communities dedicated to complex and far-reaching conspiracy narratives.

While it's easy to dismiss such theories as harmless speculation, experts warn of the potential damage they can cause to public trust and the democratic process. As social media continues to amplify even the most outlandish claims, the responsibility falls on both politicians and the public to critically evaluate information before sharing it.

In the end, there remains no credible evidence to support the claim that President Biden or any member of his family is using body doubles.

NOW READ: Field for Harris VP pick narrowed to 3

Mark Robinson's wife ordered to pay $132,000 following investigation

The North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) has ordered Balanced Nutrition Inc., a nonprofit organization led by Yolanda Hill, wife of Lt. Gov. Mark Robinson, to repay over $132,000 in federal funding. This order comes after the agency found "serious deficiencies" in the organization's operations, according to NC Newsline.

Balanced Nutrition, established by Hill in 2015, has been assisting child care centers in applying for and receiving federal funding for children's meals. However, according to a letter sent by DHHS on Friday, the nonprofit improperly billed the federal food program. The issues included excessive administrative costs, inadequate documentation for some food purchases, and buying items not permitted for the childcare program.

The total amount Balanced Nutrition is required to repay is $132,118.86. DHHS clarified that this repayment is separate from the Notice of Serious Deficiency, which requires the organization to document proposed corrective actions.

One specific issue highlighted by DHHS was the employment of Kimberly Cephas, Hill's daughter, without proper disclosure of the relationship. This violates program regulations, as DHHS approval is required for such hires. The agency is seeking reimbursement for labor expenses claimed for Cephas.

Earlier this year, Hill abruptly announced the closure of Balanced Nutrition, citing her husband's campaign for governor as the reason. This decision came as the state was preparing to conduct a compliance review of the organization. Hill later accused DHHS of targeting Balanced Nutrition due to her husband's political position. Since then, she has refused to meet with DHHS officials.

Despite officially shutting down Balanced Nutrition on April 30, Hill is still required to respond to DHHS requests. This is because the agency had already scheduled a compliance review to begin two weeks prior to the closure date. The letter from DHHS notes that Hill has not responded to multiple attempts by the state agency to set up a meeting to discuss the findings.

DHHS has made several attempts to schedule an in-person exit conference through various means of communication, including email, telephone, and written correspondence. However, they have received no response from Hill or the organization.

Balanced Nutrition now has a two-week deadline to submit a plan of correction for the earlier finding of "serious deficiency." This situation highlights the importance of proper management and transparency in organizations receiving federal funding, especially those with potential political connections.

NOW READ: Field for Harris VP pick narrowed to 3

Field for Harris VP pick narrowed to 3: report

Vice President Kamala Harris has narrowed her potential list of running mates to three candidates, according to Bloomberg News.

Bloomberg reported on Saturday that Harris is considering a wide range of vice presidential candidates from the Democratic Party's bench. However, sources familiar with the process indicate that a short list has emerged, featuring three elected officials with nationwide appeal: Arizona Senator Mark Kelly, Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro, and Minnesota Governor Tim Walz.

When approached for comment, a spokesperson for the Harris campaign confirmed to Bloomberg that the Vice President has "directed her team to begin the process of vetting potential running mates," but declined to provide further details. Media reports suggest that Harris is expected to make her decision by August 7th.

Josh Shapiro, the Democratic governor of Pennsylvania, secured a decisive victory in the 2022 election. Prior to his governorship, the 51-year-old Democrat served as Pennsylvania's Attorney General from 2017 to 2021. During his tenure as Attorney General, Shapiro gained recognition for his investigations into clergy sex abuse and his efforts to protect voting rights. He has also been at the forefront of combating the opioid crisis and human trafficking in Pennsylvania.

Mark Kelly, a former NASA astronaut, currently serves as the junior United States Senator from Arizona. He won his Senate seat in 2020, defeating Republican incumbent Martha McSally. Before entering politics, Kelly had a distinguished career as a naval aviator and astronaut, participating in four space shuttle missions between 2001 and 2011. In the Senate, Kelly has focused on issues such as veterans' affairs, science and technology, and climate change. He's also been a vocal advocate for gun control, co-founding the organization Americans for Responsible Solutions with his wife, former Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords. Known for his moderate stance, Kelly brings valuable experience in border issues, an area where Harris has faced criticism.

Tim Walz, the current Governor of Minnesota, first took office in 2018. Before his governorship, Walz served in the U.S. House of Representatives. His background includes careers in education and the military, having enlisted in the Army National Guard in 1981 and serving for 24 years. As governor, Walz gained national attention for his handling of the COVID-19 pandemic and his response to the civil unrest following the death of George Floyd in Minneapolis in 2020.

As the vetting process continues, political analysts and the public alike will be watching closely to see who Harris selects as her running mate, a decision that could significantly impact the upcoming election.

Trump accused of bilking millions from MAGA fans for bogus 'election defense fund'

In his new book "The Longest Con: How Grifters, Swindlers, and Frauds Hijacked American Conservatism", political observer Joe Conason accuses former President Donald Trump of defrauding his MAGA supporters by raising hundreds of millions of dollars under the guise of an "election defense fund" after the 2020 presidential election.

Appearing on MSNBC's "Morning Joe" to promote his book, Conason, a longtime political commentator, made the case that Trump is deeply embroiled in grifting and scamming his own conservative base.

The book's foreword was written by George Conway, a self-described "honest conservative" who has been highly critical of Trump.

READ: 'Stop electing stupid people': Rage as Marjorie Taylor Greene flunks American history test

Conason explained that his book "tells a story of how conservatives got to the point where they are milking their own constituents for every penny they can squeeze out of them on false pretenses in almost every case." He described Trump's post-election fundraising as the "epitome" of this problem on the right.

According to Conason, in the weeks after the 2020 election, Trump "booked a quarter of a billion dollars" by telling his supporters he was setting up an "official election defense fund." However, the money did not actually go towards challenging the election results. Instead, it ended up in a super PAC controlled by Trump, which he could use for his own personal legal defense and other expenses.

This accusation fits into a broader pattern that Conason sees within the conservative movement. He argues that many Republican leaders and figures have been exploiting their supporters through dishonest and fraudulent means.

Conason's book aims to expose this "grifting" and "scamming" that he believes has become rampant on the right. The context here is important. "The Longest Con" comes at a time when Trump is facing a growing number of legal challenges, including criminal indictments in New York, Florida, and Washington, D.C.

Conason's claims about Trump's post-election fundraising tactics seem designed to further undermine the former president's credibility among his core supporters.

Additionally, Conason's accusations reflect a longstanding criticism of Trump's business practices and his tendency to take advantage of his followers.

Throughout his career, Trump has been accused of running various scams, such as the failed Trump University, and repeatedly stiffing contractors and vendors who have done work for him.

By highlighting Trump's alleged exploitation of his own voters, Conason is tapping into a broader narrative about the former president's unethical behavior and his willingness to prioritize his own interests over those of his supporters.

The book's title, "The Longest Con," suggests that this pattern of grifting and fraud has been a defining feature of Trump's political rise and the conservative movement more broadly.

Overall, Conason's appearance on "Morning Joe" and the claims made in his new book represent a scathing indictment of Trump and the state of American conservatism. By exposing what he sees as rampant dishonesty and self-serving grift, Conason aims to hold the former president and his allies accountable and to shed light on the deeper problems plaguing the conservative movement.

Watch the segment below or at this link:

MSNBC 07 08 2024 07 05 55 youtu.be

Won’t make 'the same mistake' again: World preps for Trump 2.0

The world was caught off guard by Donald Trump's "America First" approach and skepticism towards traditional alliances like NATO when he took office in 2016.

In 2016, no one in the world was ready for President Trump. America’s NATO allies aren’t making the same mistake this time.

During his presidency, Trump frequently criticized NATO allies for not spending enough on defense and threatened to withdraw the U.S. from the alliance if members didn't increase their military budgets.

This time around, as Trump eyes a potential return to the White House in 2024, a new article from Politico suggests that NATO allies and other nations are scrambling to position themselves for a second Trump term. Based on his previous tenure, they anticipate a Trump administration would be defined by isolationism, confrontation with allies, and a laser focus on countering China rather than Russia.

According to the article, countries are taking three main steps to prepare:

First, there is extensive personal outreach to Trump and his advisers, in the hope of building relationships that will help minimize conflict.

Second, there are policy shifts aimed at pleasing Trump and his political coalition, chiefly by soothing Trump’s complaints about inadequate European defense spending.

Third, there are creative diplomatic and legal measures in the works to armor NATO priorities against tampering by a Trump administration.There are also bipartisan efforts underway in Congress to make it harder for a president to withdraw from NATO without Congressional approval.

The preparations highlight how Trump's past criticism of NATO as "obsolete" and his transactional view of alliances has fundamentally reshaped international relations.

Allies that once hoped Trump's tenure was a mere blip now view "Trumpism" as an entrenched ideology they must contend with.

However, some analysts warn that personal outreach and policy concessions may prove futile given Trump's unpredictable nature.

One adviser is quoted saying, "We don't know - and I think nobody knows, exactly - what he will do."

There are concerns Trump could be even more disruptive in a second term without constraints from advisers like Jim Mattis and H.R. McMaster, who acted as a check on his "America First" instincts during his first presidency.

While panic about a complete U.S. withdrawal from NATO has subsided, the alliance remains anxious about Trump's ambivalence towards collective defense, given his past threats to abandon allies that don't pay their fair share. Some former officials have indicated limits on how far the U.S. would go to defend NATO members like the Baltic states against Russian aggression.

Ultimately, the extraordinary preparations underway globally represent a plausible strategy for stability under a Trump presidency, the article argues. But it concludes that much still depends on the whims of Trump himself, who one European diplomat described as an "loose cannon" whose policies "don't really work" by traditional standards.

GOP trying to throw out 2022 primary votes in a test drive of TrumpWorld's 2024 plot

TrumpWorld figures have spent months recruiting Big Lie conspiracy theorists to seek local election offices ahead of the next presidential race after failing to overturn Donald Trump's defeat in 2020. A failed effort in New Mexico this month offered a preview of what is likely to come in local election offices run by Trump loyalists.

Trump has spent months campaigning to install loyal supporters in state-level offices to oversee upcoming elections, and now his allies are increasingly focused on taking over local offices as well. Former Trump campaign manager and White House strategist Steve Bannon, one of the loudest voices backing the Jan. 6 rally that preceded the Capitol riot, has dubbed this the "precinct strategy," urging his podcast audience to "take this back village by village … precinct by precinct."

"We're taking over all the elections," Bannon said last November. "We're going to get to the bottom of [the 2020 election] and we're going to decertify the electors. And you're going to have a constitutional crisis."

That specific scenario is unlikely, but other Trump allies, like onetime national security adviser Michael Flynn, who effectively called for a military coup to undo Trump's loss, have also pushed supporters to get involved in local races. MyPillow founder Mike Lindell, one of the biggest proponents of the voter fraud myth, even recruited sitting county election officials to help prove his claims of election rigging — though he has come up with exactly no evidence 19 months later. The Republican National Committee also appears to have embraced the strategy, recruiting and training an "army" of supporters to become poll workers in contested states like Michigan.

The RNC has already signed up thousands of people to be poll workers, according to Politico. And Republican leaders in dozens of key counties told ProPublica they have seen a surge of thousands of new Republican precinct officers since Bannon's campaign began. "I've never seen anything like this, people are coming out of the woodwork," J.C. Martin, the GOP chair in Polk County, Florida, told the outlet.

Amid ongoing investigations into TrumpWorld's failed effort to overturn the 2020 election, culminated in the Jan. 6 assault on the Capitol, his supporters are already working hard to install themselves into the process in upcoming races.

"The lie hasn't gone away. It's corrupting our Democratic institutions," Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., chair of the Jan. 6 select committee, said at Tuesday's hearing. "People who believe that lie are now seeking positions of public trust. And as seen in New Mexico, their oath to the people they serve will take a backseat to their commitment to the big lie."

Thompson was referring to Republicans on the Otero County commission, including Couy Griffin, the founder of Cowboys for Trump, who was convicted of entering the Capitol grounds on Jan. 6.

The Republican-led commission voted earlier this month not to certify any of the deep-red county's 7,123 votes in the state's June 7 gubernatorial primaries, citing unspecified concerns about Dominion voting machines. Dominion has been at the heart of repeatedly-debunked and increasingly fanciful conspiracy theories pushed by TrumpWorld, which have variously alleged a plot involving Chinese and/or German officials, along with former Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez (who died in 2013), to flip Trump votes to Joe Biden. Dominion has filed multiple billion-dollar defamation lawsuits against numerous individuals over these claims.

"I have huge concerns with these voting machines," Otero County Commissioner Vickie Marquardt said at a recent meeting, according to the Associated Press, without specifying any actual issues with the machines.

New Mexico Secretary of State Maggie Toulouse Oliver, a Democrat, asked the state Supreme Court to intervene and force the commission to certify the results, accusing its members of "appeasing unfounded conspiracy theories and potentially nullifying the votes of every Otero County voter who participated in the primary." New Mexico Attorney General Hector Balderas also threatened legal action. County Clerk Robyn Holmes, a Republican, similarly rejected the commission's demand for a hand recount of ballots because it is prohibited by state law.

"The primary went off without a hitch," she told the AP. "It was a great election."

Marquardt initially mocked the idea that a court could intervene. "And so then what? They're going to send us to the pokey?" she questioned.

But after the New Mexico Supreme Court ordered the county to certify its election results last week, Marquardt and fellow Republican commissioner Gerald Matherly relented and voted to certify the votes.

"I will be no use to the people of Otero County while in jail," Marquardt said, according to the Alamogordo Daily News, adding that the commission would instead launch a committee to investigate "tough questions" about voter fraud.

Griffin, however, refused to vote to certify the election, hours after he was fined $3,000 and sentenced to time served and community service for his role in the Capitol riot. He acknowledged that he had no proof of election fraud but said his "gut feeling" was that the process was untrustworthy.

"My vote to remain a 'no' isn't based on any evidence. It's not based on any facts," Griffin said, according to the AP. "It's only based on my gut feeling and my own intuition."

His vote not to certify election results, said the founder of Cowboys for Trump, "isn't based on any evidence. It's not based on any facts. It's only based on my gut feeling and my own intuition."

Oliver said in a statement after the vote that she was "relieved" that the commission "finally did the right thing and followed their duty" under state law. But she criticizing commissioners who "admitted that they did not have any facts to support not certifying the election results."

Oliver also referred the commission members to the state attorney general's office. "All county officials take an oath to uphold the constitution and laws of New Mexico," she said. "The Commissioners in Otero County have violated the public's trust and our state laws through their recent actions and must be held accountable."

In fact, Otero was not the only New Mexico county that encountered unexpected drama over seemingly uncontroversial party primary results. In Torrance County, commissioners certified the vote despite fury from conservatives who called the members "cowards and traitors" for certifying the election, according to the AP. In Sandoval County, protesters had to be cleared from the room after Commissioner Jay Block, a failed Republican gubernatorial primary candidate, cast a sole vote to block the certification to no avail.

But Otero County, which Trump carried with 62% of the vote, has emerged as ground zero for the ongoing Republican efforts to stoke the Big Lie about nonexistent election fraud. The county previously launched a so-called audit of the 2020 election after lobbying from David and Erin Clements, who have become key figures in election conspiracy theory.

David Clements, a former New Mexico prosecutor who now describes himself as a "traveling audit salesman," has been pushing a theory that all voting machines "have been skewing results for years" in "every county" on his popular Telegram channel, according to Vice News.

"Traveling audit salesman" David Clements is pushing the theory that all voting machines everywhere in the country "have been skewing results for years."

The Otero County Commission paid $50,000 in taxpayer funds for an audit encouraged by Clements and awarded the contract to a company called EchoMail, which is run by conspiracy theorist Shiva Ayyadurai and also took part in the failed election "audit" in Arizona's Maricopa County. EchoMail contracted a group called the "New Mexico Audit Force," which went door-to-door to question residents about how they voted. EchoMail ultimately admitted it had "found No Election Fraud" but the effort came under fire over concerns about voter intimidation.

Oliver described this effort as a "vigilante audit" and Brian Colón, the state auditor, said the county commissioners "may have abused their power" in approving the contract, calling it a "careless and extravagant waste of public funds, which does not appear to serve any useful purpose to the taxpayers of Otero County."

The House Oversight Committee launched an investigation into the audit over concerns that it illegally interfered with Americans' right to vote by "spreading disinformation about elections and intimidating voters" and potentially resulting in "intimidation directed at minority voters."

But Clements has continued to lobby the county to embrace his conspiracy theories, urging them to ban all voting machines. Along with their refusal to certify the results, county commissioners also voted to remove all voting machines.

Clements, who has appeared at events alongside Bannon, Flynn and Lindell, is pushing conspiracy theorists in other counties to seek positions in county election offices to approve so-called forensic audits and bans on voting machines, which could lead to long delays in vote counting.

"The opportunity to get three votes from MAGA-friendly county commissioners to get rid of machines is staggering," he wrote on Telegram in January. "No more bottlenecks."

Bush ethics lawyer: The Jan. 6 committee needs to follow the money

In an opinion piece for MSNBC, Richard Painter -- the chief White House ethics lawyer in the George W. Bush administration from 2005 to 2007 -- brings up what many see as a 'critical' question about the aims of the House Select Committee's public hearings regarding the events of January 6, 2021, as well as identifies "several key areas where the Jan. 6 committee should be directing their focus."

"Where did the money come from? Who paid for this over two-month effort to reverse the results of an election that President Joe Biden won by over eight million votes? And who paid for what almost became a military coup as well as a violent insurrection?," Painter writes. "It is also illegal to use campaign funds to pay for an insurrection or any other illegal conduct."

As Painter further points out, "Many of the insurrectionists came to Washington on bus trips organized and paid for by political organizations in their states of origin, in many cases with funds from state Republican Party organizations, campaigns or related political entities. Political funds can be used for legal challenges to the results of an election when a legitimate challenge can be made. Likewise, campaign funds can be used to stage a rally to support the election of a candidate before the election or a rally to claim victory or concede defeat after the election."

"But campaign funds cannot legally be used to attempt to overturn an election by anti-democratic means. Moreover, campaign funds cannot legally be used to encourage political supporters to break the law. Both the Trump campaign and state GOP organizations should have known as much," Painter writes.

Painter also points a finger both at conservative media and social media platforms.

"The second source of funding that should be considered wasn’t cash, but the in-kind donations that came from the conservative media outlets that spread the Big Lie. Fox News of course comes to mind, but there were many others, including talk radio stations, blogs and more ...the Jan. 6 committee should expose the actions of the largest media companies, including not just cable television and radio stations but social media giants like Facebook as well. Congress already has heard from the Facebook “whistleblower” Frances Haugen about how Facebook was adjusting its rules to accommodate false statements posted by Trump, his campaign and his supporters up to Jan. 6. Likewise, these companies were happy to take campaign money to post and air ads that spread these lies after the election."

Many of the organizations that helped spread Trump's "Big Lie" are publicly traded companies that owe an explanation to their shareholders and other investors, as Painter indicates.

The former Bush administration official also identifies another important funder of Jan. 6 -- the US taxpayer.

You can read all of Richard Painter's commentary here.

More than 15 Republicans are testing the waters for 2024 -- 'even if Trump runs': report

Mike Pence, Tom Cotton and Ron DeSantis are already dipping their toes into the race for the Republican Party's 2024 presidential nomination, according to a new report in the Washington Post. But, they're not the only ones.

"With months to go before the midterm elections, the shadow campaign for the 2024 Republican nomination is well underway, with at least 15 potential candidates traveling the country, drawing up plans, huddling with donors or testing out messages at various levels of preparation. The quadrennial circus — described by more than 20 people with direct knowledge who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss private machinations — has kicked into gear despite the public hints from Trump that he too plans to join the scrum 'a third time,' says the report.

"Interviews with over a dozen GOP operatives indicate he is not clearing the field, and a range of candidates plan to take him on from different angles."

Included in the list of prominent Republicans making the rounds through Iowa and New Hampshire are Tim Scott, Chris Christie, Mike Pompeo, Larry Hogan, Nikki Haley, Ted Cruz, Rick Scott and would-be Trump nemesis Liz Cheney.

The Post notes, that 'they have been encouraged by growing concern among deep-pocketed Republican donors that another Trump run — especially an announcement before the midterms — would help Democrats."

But, as the report also observes, Trump challengers are in for a hard slog, as the former president still dominates both internal and external polls "by a country mile."

Campaign experts cited in the report see hitting Trump hard from the right is the only hope a challenger has to defeat the former president.

“If you come at Trump from the left — say a Mitt Romney approach — I don’t think that would ever work. If you came at Trump from the right — more like a Pence or a Pompeo or a Ted Cruz or a DeSantis — then I think people would be willing to listen.”

You can read the full report here.

Staff Bio: Meaghan Ellis

Meghan Ellis is a 2009 graduate of Southern University A&M College and has held reporting stints at The Inquisitor and The Independent Journal Review, as well as copywriting assignments at Kinetic Koncepts and Dagney Media and Publishing.

Staff Bio: Brandon Gage

Brandon Gage is a 2007 graduate of Indiana University, Bloomington and has held political reporting stints at The Hill Reporter and George Takei's Comic Sands. He lives in New York, where he also produces nightlife events.

Why the Jack the Ripper story endures

The message finally landed with my husband how much of a serial killer buff he had married after 12 years as we were watching "Mindhunter," the Netflix drama series based on the book by the same name about the FBI's Elite Serial Crime Unit. I was able to call out the serial killers before they were named on screen, then give a summary of their crimes; the types of victims they pursued, where and when they operated. I can't be sure if he was impressed or petrified. Perhaps both.

I'm certainly not alone in harboring a fascination with murder. Over 70 million people downloaded the 2014 podcast "Serial," about the 1999 murder of 17-year-old Hae Min Lee. And true crime has been a thriving economy for years: books, documentaries, tours — not to mention the crime-inspired TV dramas, movies, novels and more. Harold Schechter, an American true crime writer, referred to the specific fascination with serial killers as "cultural hysteria," and it doesn't look to be fading anytime soon.

I can remember the exact moment my obsession began. I was around six or seven years old and at home with my mother. She specifically told me that I was under no circumstances to open a book she had brought home from the library, which she then left on the floor by her handbag. Of course, as soon as I had an opportunity I reached for the book, looked along the edge of the pages where it was darker which told me where the pictures were, and flicked open to see what it was I should never see. I opened the book on the mortuary photographs of Catherine Eddowes, the fourth canonical victim of Jack the Ripper. The grainy black and white photographs of a wretched woman with her nose cut off and her stomach sagging like a burst balloon from where she had been mutilated. A nightmarish picture was scarred on the back of my eyelids forever.

Jack was my "gateway drug" into serial killers. He hardly needs an introduction, but he committed the mutilation murders of five women assumed to be sex workers in and around Whitechapel, London, from August to November in 1888, at which point the murders stopped. By then he had, quite literally, etched his way into the zeitgeist. His name conjures up images of dark and misty alleyways and blood curdling screams, and is synonymous with the poverty of Victorian England — much to the embarrassment of the British Empire.

But what is it about Jack that has such enduring appeal? It wasn't as if violence in 1888 was rare. The life expectancy for a man from the East End of London was 26 years old, kept low by the diminished life expectancy of casual laborers, who took on unsecure and often deadly work. Infant mortality rates were high as well, and childhood diseases were rife. Simply being alive was risky enough, not taking murders — most of which were of the domestic violence variety or gang related — into account. It doesn't explain why this one murderer has lingered on. Personally, I think Jack endured because of a perfect storm of events — a combination of technology, social and political unrest, wealth inequality and public anger.

Today we are used to news traveling the world in a matter of seconds. There's an insatiable thirst for content and we expect it for free. Traditionally printed newspaper sales may have declined, but in 1888 the newspaper was king and the only source of information. Looking back is like looking at a dress rehearsal of how we are learning to cope with social media — drowning in notifications, clickbait and 24-hour news coverage, bewildered by the effects this technology is having on our world.

I propose that it's fair to compare the two eras. The telegraph was invented in the early 1800s. By the mid-1800s the laying of telegraph cables underground and across the seabed started, and this connected continents and led to the creation of news agencies. Before the telegraph, messages had to be sent the same way people and goods traveled — by road or water — but by 1888 news could be sent from nearly anywhere in the world and be printed in The Times the next day. Not only did the murders shock the people of London, they shocked the world. And as circulation increased, so did the appetite for more news — and this encouraged an increase in sensationalist reporting.

Victorian culture was notoriously class-ridden, and tensions were already high on Sunday, November 13, 1887, when Sir Charles Warren, Commissioner of Police, banned all meetings in Trafalgar Square. Demonstrations by the unemployed had been taking place every day since the summer and homeless people slept in the square and washed in the fountain. The police were under pressure to end such an embarrassing situation. The resulting event, which became known as Bloody Sunday, saw around 150 people treated at local hospitals. Up to 300 rioters were arrested.

A common feature of the press coverage of these class tensions was the dramatization of Whitechapel itself — the cliché of the slum ghetto, a trap of misery and hunger. The truth, as it always is, was more nuanced. But that's not what people saw in the daily newspaper. It is worth mentioning that London was the richest city in the world at the time. Jack the Ripper, simply put, was an embarrassment. Jack unwittingly shone a light on a system rigged towards the upper classes and a government policy of conscious neglect. Jack brought age-old arguments to the surface. But this time, the world watched.

His ongoing anonymity remains a key part of his appeal. The monster in any horror movie is always scarier before you see it. Once his or her identity is revealed, the fear disappears. As with most serial killers, they're likely to be ordinary and underwhelming on the surface. It's almost disappointing, so perhaps it has a lot to do with the faceless figure in the dark who can exist as a bespoke monster. A shared concept, but entirely different in each person's imagination.

It's true that the murders didn't evoke much sympathy for victims. They were referred to in newspapers as "unfortunates," code for prostitute. But when Catherine Eddowes was murdered beyond Aldgate and within the boundary of the City it whipped up more hysteria. Jack was commuting, and that meant women of a higher class — respectable, less disposable — might become victims. If people gawked before, now they were frightened … and it was a thrill.

Put in simple terms, the brain doesn't differentiate much between fear or excitement, so anyone who has experienced terror at the thought of public speaking and been on any presentation course or sought therapy for social anxiety will have encountered the theory of reframing fear as nervous anticipation. We know the hysteria and news was lapped up by the general population, but especially young middle-class women. Imagine you were a cosseted Victorian woman stuck indoors with little or no mental stimulation or likelihood of any adventure. The fear the Ripper produced was as close to a thrill you were likely to get. And Jack was also making people angry — at the women, at the poor, at the police, at the government. Anger hits the amygdala and pumps chemicals around the brain. We can get hooked on these chemicals, with the brain looking for the next anger-stoking piece of news to get that luscious hit again.

Speaking for myself, it's clear the obsession started with my mother's questionable '80s parenting and seeing those autopsy photographs. I remember being shocked and unable to look away, like rubbernecking at a car accident. When I was older, I learned about the Moors Murderers, Ian Brady and Myra Hindley, who buried their child victims on the Yorkshire moors. My mother came from Yorkshire, although we lived in London, and I'd overheard her tell people that her sister had worked as a cleaner in the coroners' office and somehow seen photographs of the children she never recovered from. The mugshots of their defiant faces eyeballing the camera still haunts most of the UK.

The same with the Yorkshire Ripper, who targeted women walking alone after dark. Again, the connection with Yorkshire and my mother's origins made it relatable. As in the case of the Ripper murders, the police conducted the investigation with a huge complimentary dose of sexism and ego, enabling Peter Sutcliffe to evade capture and go onto murder at least 13 women.

In 1994 came Fred and Rose West, the horror couple who abducted vulnerable girls, torturing them in their own private dungeon as their children played. They lived in Gloucester, which was miles away, but Fred West had worked on an industrial estate near where we lived. The police even searched the site looking for other victims. I was 16 at the time, a similar age to some of the victims, and we all talked about the murders. It spread fear through us — or was it a thrill? These were high-profile cases with a slither of intimacy that could penetrate my bubble and feed my fascination and intrigue.

This is why Jack the Ripper endures — he's the embodiment of anonymity, fear, anger and media hype. He's less of a person and more part of our culture. When I set out to write a story during the Whitechapel murders it was because I wanted to explore the hysteria of the time. What was it like to live during such uncertainty with an unseen monster holding everyone to ransom? I didn't expect to find myself living through something not altogether dissimilar with COVID-19.

The privileged of us will likely survive the pandemic. But we have still fed off the fear and devoured the sensationalized news. We've needed the emails, calls, notifications, podcasts, movies, Netflix, Facebook, trolls, Twitter, binary tribal choices about masks and vaccines. Humans can reduce complex fears to a single shot to the amygdala, and feed it daily. Be angry and be afraid: It's an economy and we are all at its mercy. A bit like a serial killer, waiting for the next strike so we can all get our fix.

Fox News analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano accused of sexually abusing man in 1980s who faced arson charge in his court

Fox News legal analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano sexually abused a man accused of arson in his court in the 1980s, a lawsuit charged Friday.The federal lawsuit filed by South Carolina resident Charles Corbishley alleges that Napolitano attacked him at a Hackensack, N.J., home.Corbishley seeks $10 million under the New Jersey Child Victims Act.“You know, you could be going away for a long time,” Napolitano allegedly told Corbishely, who was 20 years old at the time, according to the lawsuit.Napolitano, who was wearing a trench coat, then told Corbishley to “be a good boy” and forced him to “perfo...

Keep reading... Show less

'It's a lack of respect' : Why some Haitians felt spurned by Kamala Harris' Miami visit

MIAMI — Sen. Kamala Harris courted Venezuelan, Black-American and Jewish voters during her first visit to Miami on behalf of her running mate, Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden.But other than a “Sak pase “ by Harris — Creole for “what’s happening” — Haitian American representation was mostly absent from Thursday’s campaign stop, reinforcing feelings of neglect by a large contingent of the South Florida Black community that has long felt overlooked by Democratic politicians.“When I turn on my TV, you hear everything in the Hispanic community about (President) Trump or about Biden. Biden...

Keep reading... Show less

Trump may be down in the polls -- but he's tops for bettors

New York (AFP) - For the time being, all the polls seem to be going Joe Biden's way ahead of the November 3 presidential election. But gamblers see a different reality and are putting their money on Donald Trump.The Republican incumbent, who is seeking a second term, has slowly climbed back since late July to nearly even with the Democratic former vice president.For some Australian and British bookmakers, Trump is the odds-on favorite.Betting on national or local elections is illegal in the United States. All the action is happening on foreign gambling sites -- which Americans can sometimes ac...

Keep reading... Show less

Theranos founder Holmes to claim mental condition affecting 'issue of guilt'

SAN JOSE, Calif. — Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes, charged with a dozen felony fraud counts over her defunct Palo Alto blood-testing startup, plans to introduce evidence of a mental condition that affects the issue of guilt, a blockbuster judge’s order has revealed.Federal prosecutors will be allowed to subject the Stanford University dropout to 14 hours of psychiatric testing and examination over two days, Judge Edward Davila said in a ruling this week.Holmes in December notified prosecutors of her intent “to introduce expert evidence relating to a mental disease or defect or any other men...

Keep reading... Show less

Democrat abruptly bows out of Georgia congressional race against QAnon supporter Marjorie Taylor Greene

ATLANTA — Democrat Kevin Van Ausdal abruptly ended his longshot campaign for Congress on Friday against Marjorie Taylor Greene, a move that gave the controversial Republican an even clearer shot at a seat in the U.S. House.Van Ausdal released a statement that cited “personal and family reasons” for quitting the 14th Congressional District race and moving out of the state. The campaign declined to share further details about the sudden announcement, though a spokesman said he and his staffers didn’t receive any threats to drop out.“Although all the details will remain my family’s alone, please ...

Keep reading... Show less

Universities are suspending students who party without masks and flout social distancing: 'If you don't abide by the rules, there's no place for you here'

College students, beware: You could temporarily lose your spot on campus — or worse, get expelled — for partying with your peers this fall.It happened at Purdue University in Indiana, where 36 students received “summary suspensions” earlier this month for attending an off-campus gathering that lacked face masks and social distancing, just hours after a warning from administrators.The Ohio State University issued about 225 interim suspensions for off-campus parties and gatherings between Aug. 19 and 23, spokesman Benjamin Johnson said. More than half of the suspensions were lifted after student...

Keep reading... Show less
BRAND NEW STORIES
@2024 - AlterNet Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. - "Poynter" fonts provided by fontsempire.com.